Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2017-03-16 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0583 HB 57 CSHB 57(FIN) am was before the House in second reading. Amendment No. 54 was offered by Representative Seaton: Page 67, line 14: Delete 1,022,050" Insert "1,022,500" Representative Seaton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 54 be adopted. Representative Saddler objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 54 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 54 YEAS: 23 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 6 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0584 Yeas: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Nays: Birch, Eastman, Johnson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Talerico, Tilton, Wilson Excused: Claman, Neuman Absent: Chenault, Johnston, Kopp, Millett, Rauscher, Sullivan-Leonard And so, Amendment No. 54 was adopted. Representative Millett placed a call of the House. Amendment No. 56 was offered by Representatives Johnson, Saddler, Thompson, Pruitt, Wilson, Reinbold, Eastman, Millett, Rauscher, Tilton, and Birch: Page 27, line 13: Delete "126,738,000" Insert "130,960,120" Delete "115,916,000" Insert "120,138,120" Page 27, line 22: Delete "10,501,400" Insert "14,723,520" Page 27, line 33: Delete "13,647,800" in both places Insert "9,425,680" in both places Page 28, line 9: Delete "13,647,800" Insert "9,425,680" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. **The presence of Representative Neuman, who was excused (page 573), was noted. 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0585 Representative Johnson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 56 be adopted. There was objection. Representative Johnson moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 56. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 57 was offered by Representatives Birch, Wilson, Kopp, Neuman, Eastman, Tilton, Pruitt, Johnston, Reinbold, Millett, Chenault, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Knopp, Johnson, Saddler, Thompson, and Rauscher: Page 37, following line 26: Insert new material to read: "APPROPRIATION GENERAL OTHER ALLOCATIONS ITEMS FUND FUNDS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Executive Branch-wide Unallocated Appropriations * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Executive Branch-wide -1,776,600 -1,137,700 -638,900 Unallocated Reduction Executive Branch-wide -1,776,600 Unallocated Reduction" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Birch moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 57 be adopted. Representative Seaton objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 57 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 57 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0586 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Claman And so, Amendment No. 57 was not adopted. Amendment No. 58 was offered by Representatives Wilson, Saddler, Eastman, Millett, Reinbold, Sullivan-Leonard, Kopp, Chenault, Rauscher, Pruitt, Knopp, Talerico, Johnson, Tilton, and Johnston: Page 6, line 18: Delete "4,351,800" Insert "3,477,300" Delete "4,574,400" Insert "5,448,900" Page 38, line 26: Delete "9,536,900" Insert "8,662,400" Page 39, line 10: Delete "381,800" Insert "1,256,300" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 58 be adopted. Representative Fansler objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 58 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0587 CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 58 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Claman Tuck changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 58 was not adopted. Amendment No. 59 was offered by Representative Reinbold: Page 51, following line 6: Insert a new subsection to read: "(c) It is the intent of the legislature that no state funds be used for specialty memberships, except when authorized by law." Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 59 be adopted. Representative Seaton objected. Representative Millett lifted the call. Representative Reinbold placed a call of the House. The Speaker stated the call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 59 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 59 YEAS: 33 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0588 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Kawasaki, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Westlake, Wilson Nays: Guttenberg, Josephson, Kito, Seaton, Spohnholz, Wool Excused: Claman And so, Amendment No. 59 was adopted. Amendment No. 55 was offered by Representatives Chenault and Millett: Page 37, following line 22: Insert new material to read: "It is the intent of the legislature that any lapsing funds from this appropriation not be reappropriated or appropriated for capital projects." Representative Chenault moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 55 be adopted. Representative Foster objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 55 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 55 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0589 Excused: Claman And so, Amendment No. 55 was not adopted. Amendment No. 56 (page 584) was again offered by Representative Johnson. Representative Johnson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 56 be adopted. There was objection. Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 56 was offered by Representative Kawasaki: Under Page 27, Line 33 through Page 28, Line 9: Delete all material. Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 56 be adopted. Representative Saddler objected. The Speaker cautioned members to restrict comments to the amendment. Representative Millett rose to a point of order. The Speaker cautioned members to refrain from impugning the motives of other members. The question being: "Shall Amendment No.1 to Amendment No. 56 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 56 YEAS: 21 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0590 Yeas: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Excused: Claman And so, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 56 was adopted. Representative Johnson moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 56 as amended. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 53 was offered by Representatives Wool, Josephson, Claman, Kawasaki, Fansler, Gara, Tuck, Parish, and Guttenberg: Page 35, line 17: Delete "884,524,600" Insert "900,524,600" Delete "655,819,100" Insert "671,819,100" Page 35, line 18: Delete "-10,842,500" Insert "5,157,500" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Wool moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 53 be adopted. There was objection. Representative Wool moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 53. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0591 Representative Spohnholz moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 59 (page 587). There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 59 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 59 YEAS: 33 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Kawasaki, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Westlake, Wilson Nays: Guttenberg, Josephson, Kito, Seaton, Tuck, Wool Excused: Claman And so, Amendment No. 59 was adopted. Representative Kreiss-Tomkins moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 52 (page 581). There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 52 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 52 YEAS: 34 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Tilton, Tuck, Westlake, Wilson Nays: Chenault, Guttenberg, Kito, Thompson, Wool 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0592 Excused: Claman And so, Amendment No. 52 was adopted. Amendment No. 61 was offered by Representatives Pruitt and Reinbold: Page 51, following line 6: Insert a new subsection to read: "(c) It is the intent of the legislature that the unrestricted general fund appropriations in the state operating budget for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, not exceed $3,900,000,000." Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 61 be adopted. Representative Kito objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 61 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 61 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Claman And so, Amendment No. 61 was not adopted. Amendment No. 60 was offered by Representative Reinbold: Page 51, following line 6: Insert a new subsection to read: "(c) It is the intent of the legislature that the state's online checkbook include the appropriation and allocation for every expense over $1,000." 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0593 Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 60 be adopted. Representative Seaton objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 60 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 60 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Kawasaki, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Chenault, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Thompson, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Claman Tarr changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, Amendment No. 60 was not adopted. Amendment No. 62 was offered by Representatives Tilton, Saddler, and Wilson: Page 22, line 13: Delete "14,785,900" Insert "14,374,700" Delete "10,115,800" Insert "9,704,600" Page 22, line 14: Delete "12,924,400" Insert "12,513,200" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0594 Representative Tilton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 62 be adopted. Representative Foster objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 62 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 62 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Claman Absent: Saddler And so, Amendment No. 62 was not adopted. Amendment No. 63 was offered by Representative Wilson: Page 7, line 27: Delete "9,567,800" Insert "8,853,300" Delete "9,300,600" Insert "8,586,100" Page 7, line 28: Delete "1,956,400" Insert "1,241,900" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0595 Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 63 be adopted. Representative Kawasaki objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 63 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 63 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Claman Absent: Rauscher And so, Amendment No. 63 was not adopted. Amendment No. 64 was offered by Representative Wilson: Page 7, line 27: Delete "9,567,800" Insert "9,473,412" Delete "9,300,600" Insert "9,206,212" Page 7, line 28: Delete "1,956,400" Insert "1,862,012" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0596 Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 64 be adopted. There was objection. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 64 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 64 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Claman And so, Amendment No. 64 was not adopted. Amendment No. 65 was offered by Representative Wilson: Page 9, line 25: Delete "38,995,900" Insert "38,901,054" Delete "17,984,100" Insert "17,889,254" Page 9, line 26: Delete "882,600" Insert "787,754" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 65 be adopted. There was objection. 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0597 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 65 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 65 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Claman Absent: Knopp And so, Amendment No. 65 was not adopted. Amendment No. 66 was offered by Representative Wilson: Page 10, line 8: Delete "501,300" in both places Insert "429,506" in both places Page 10, line 9: Delete "501,300" Insert "429,506" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 66 be adopted. Representative Kawasaki objected. 2017-03-16 House Journal Page 0598 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 66 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 66 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Claman And so, Amendment No. 66 was not adopted.